|
|
Privacy Issues with Google Buzz |
|
Written by Jeffrey Neu
|
|
Google recently launched Buzz, a new social networking tool, which has already generated a slew of complaints from privacy watchdogs. Buzz is an opt-out program, meaning that Gmail users are automatically signed up for Buzz, with the option of removing themselves from the Buzz network. In the first version of Buzz, there was a feature which combed through a user's Gmail inbox to identify people that the user emailed most, and automatically added those people as followers without the user's consent. Google responded to many of the initial complaints by revamping Buzz's functions. The revised version changed the "auto-follow" feature to an "auto-suggest" feature, giving users the option of deciding which followers to add. Buzz also no longer connects to a user's Picasa album or Google Reader shared items.
While Google may have intended to make Buzz a seamless (or automatically linked) interface connecting various web applications, it has instead created a new internet tool that creates numerous privacy issues. In one case, a blogger lashed out at Google for adding an abusive ex-boyfriend as a follower and displaying private information to him. The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has already filed a complaint with the United States Federal Trade Commission charging Google with violating user privacy. It will be interesting to see how Google responds to EPIC's complaint.
Sources: http://www.financialpost.com/news-sectors/technology/story.html?id=2577830 http://www.pcworld.com/article/189607/google_buzz_then_and_now.html http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/189532/epic_files_privacy_complaint_against_google_buzz.html http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/189329/google_apologizes_for_buzz_privacy_issues.html?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a38:g26:r1:c0.014090:b30759636:z0 |
|
Digital Privacy: Cell-Phone Privacy Rights |
|
Written by Jennifer Yoon
|
|
If you have a cellular phone with you, the federal government can probably pinpoint your location to within 150 feet. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently heard a case addressing the level of privacy the public can expect in their cellular-phone use, in particular, information regarding when and where cellular phone calls are made and received.
|
|
|
RIAA - Thomas verdict reduced from damages of $1.92M to $54k |
|
Written by Jeffrey Neu
|
|
Capital Records v. Thomas-Rasset has been a very closely followed lawsuit to say the least. It demonstrated one of the largest verdicts in a copyright infrignement case, and was the most high profile with respect to Peer to Peer file sharing against an individual.
Judge Davis based his decision upon standard principles of "remittitur", Davis indicated that because the jury had determined the damages, his powers and jurisdiction was limited to the maximum amount a jury could reasonably award. The RIAA has 7 days to decide whether to accept the reduced verdict, or to request a new trial. It will be an interesting decision for the RIAA, as they have the expense of a whole new trial, or accept what could amount to legal precedence for the limit on a reasonable award for copyright infringement for P2P file sharing. |
|
EFF DMCA Tadedown Hall of Shame......Hilton, Yahoo, and others |
|
Written by Jeffrey Neu
|
|
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (or EFF for short) is a very serious group, with a serious intent, and yet their humor is sometimes just so inviting. They have added four more groups to their takedown hall of shame (That would be DMCA Takedown)...highlighting gross abuses of DMCA takedown's that were issued clearly without any sense or comprehension of "Free Speech".
You can find it here: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/01/hello-streisand-effect-takedown-hall-shame-grows-f |
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 39 |