News


H1-B extortion prosecution on the rise....consuting agency in Illinois under attack.
Written by Jeffrey Neu   

In the IT sector, H1-B visas are a blessing and a curse.  When used appropriately, they bring highly skilled workers to the U.S., help a market grow, and provide needed skills and resources.  When used in a different manner, they bring extortion, crime, and well, a lot of unsavory characterisitics not anticipated by the H1-B program.

The H1-B visa is a visa awarded to an individual for employement at a specific employer.  There are various requirements to qualify for an H1-B visa, including education level, job offer, and they look at your originating country and several other aspects in relation to your application.  One instance where the H1-B visa status has continually been exploited in the U.S. is in the consulting industry.  Rather than use of the H1-B visa to bring qualified individuals over to the U.S. due to a lack of a particular skill or resource in the U.S., it is used almost as indentured servitude.

Consulting agencies (often referred to as temp agencies or similar) set up a recruiting office in a country where skilled workers are paid substantially less than in the U.S. (primarily India).  They offer what would be a high paying job in India to an Indian worker and bring them to the U.S. on an H1-B visa.  Typically this job in the U.S. is for somewhere between $25k and $60k a year. On it's face, it isn't a horrible salary....many people make less, but then you take out the fees, you add in the fact that the consulting companies that do this typically "forget" to pay at least the 1st month, if not the 1st two months of salary, and then casually forget to pay the last month's salary (or two or three), and next thing you know, you have a foreign worker with an expired H1-B visa and no money for a plane ticket home.

As many in the IT industry know, foreigners, particularly those from India, or those that would like to continue working in the U.S., which come from countries where the legal system is substantially more corrupt than in the U.S., have a fear of suing or entering the legal process to collect their unpaid salary.

Just recently the Star Ledger (a newspaper in New Jersey) ran a story about an IT worker's salary not being paid, but it was even reported (shock, gasp, hold your horses).  After it was reported, the IT worker was "visited" by a few individuals.  It highlights the picture which I painted above.  Sadly, this story is far too common.  In my practice of law, I run in to this all the time.  Some cases we take and can try, some cases are just sadly too difficult to start.  Read the story here.

There are a few things that you can do to help stop this practice.

1. When hiring consutling/temp agencies, ask and require documentation of how much the consultants you are hiring are being paid per hour/year, etc.  Would you really pay $125/hour for a guy the consulting agency is paying $10 or $12/hour?

2. If the consulting/temp agency is using primarily foreigners, ensure that the workers are actually getting paid on a weekly, montly, whatever basis.  If you ask in the 1st month if they have received their paycheck, more likely than not, they will continue to receive them.

3. Pay the consultant directly for the last pay period (yes this raises a lot of other issues, but they can easily be worked aroud.)

If you have this problem, or have run in to it, let us know.  We'll do what we can.

 

 
Pranksters take a hit...US House of Representatives Passes Ban On Caller ID Spoofing...Is Google Voice (and every virtual number) on the Chopping Block?
Written by Jeffrey Neu   

The 'Truth in Caller ID Act' passed the US House of Representatives on Wednesday, April 14, 2010.  The bill is targeting software and processes which would allow a practice called "Caler ID spoofing" or inserting a name, number and other information that is not related to the actual phone number being used.  In several high-profile instances, spoofing has led people to release sensitive information -- such as Social Security and credit card numbers -- to those who then use the information to commit identity theft.

"Last year, the New York City Police Department uncovered an identity theft ring using Caller ID Spoofing to victimize over 6,000 out of more than $15 million," said U.S. Representative Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., who sponsored the legislation.

A companion bill has already passed the Senate and it awaits the last step, which is an informal conference to reconcile any differences between the bills.

The legislation has the potential of stopping the use of any and every virtual phone number.  It does not prevent caller ID blocking, where no information is sent.....so all privacy advocates can stay behind closed doors, but services like OneBox, Google Voice, virtual PBX's and any other service may just be on the chopping block.

Keep your eyes peeled as to what effects this legislation has on the startups daily life!

 
How accurate is the piracy data?
Written by Jeffrey Neu   

The United States Government Accountability office has been raising this question for the last year, and are now making their questions public.  Congress asked the GAO in April 2009 to review the data supplied by the large media companies and tasked the GAO with the requirement of quantifying the size and scope of piracy, including the impacts of Web piracy to the film and music industries.  On April 12, 2010, the GAO released a report entitled "Observations on Efforts to Quantify the Economic Effects of Counterfeit and Pirated Goods."

While there didn't appear to be anything earth shattering in the report, there was a regular statement of questioning the data provided by the industry and th data relied upon previously. A few quotes for the interested:

1. "Three widely cited U.S. government estimates of economic losses resulting from counterfeiting cannot be substantiated due to the absence of underlying studies.....First, a number of industry, media, and government publications have cited an FBI estimate that U.S. businesses lose $200-$250 billion to counterfeiting on an annual basis. This estimate was contained in a 2002 FBI press release, but FBI officials told us that it has no record of source data or methodology for generating the estimate and that it cannot be corroborated."

2. "Assumptions, such as the rate at which consumers would substitute counterfeit goods for legitimate products, can have enormous impacts on the resulting estimates and heighten the importance of transparency. Because of the significant differences in types of counterfeit and pirated goods and industries involved, no single method can be used to develop estimates, and each method has limitations."

3. "Commerce and FBI officials told us they rely on industry statistics on counterfeit and pirated goods and do not conduct any original data gathering to assess the economic impact of counterfeit and pirated goods on the U.S. economy or domestic industries."

It seems the largest portion here is that teh Gov't has used numbers which it had no source data for (most likely provided to them).  While I won't substantiate the legitimacy of piracy, I will stipulate that the Gov't needs better numbers.

If you want to read the whole report yourself, you can find it here.

 
Privacy Issues with Google Buzz
Written by Jeffrey Neu   

Google recently launched Buzz, a new social networking tool, which has already generated a slew of complaints from privacy watchdogs. Buzz is an opt-out  program, meaning that Gmail users are automatically signed up for Buzz, with the option of removing themselves from the Buzz network. In the first version of Buzz,  there was a feature which combed through a user's Gmail inbox to identify people that the user emailed most, and automatically added those people as followers without the user's consent. Google responded to many of the initial complaints by revamping Buzz's functions. The revised version changed the "auto-follow" feature to an "auto-suggest" feature, giving users the option of deciding which followers to add. Buzz also no longer connects to a user's Picasa album or Google Reader shared items.

While Google may have intended to make Buzz a seamless (or automatically linked) interface connecting various web applications, it has instead created a new   internet tool that creates numerous privacy issues. In one case, a blogger lashed out at Google for adding an abusive ex-boyfriend as a follower and displaying private information to him. The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has already filed a complaint with the United States Federal Trade Commission charging Google with violating user privacy. It will be interesting to see how Google responds to EPIC's complaint.

Sources:
http://www.financialpost.com/news-sectors/technology/story.html?id=2577830
http://www.pcworld.com/article/189607/google_buzz_then_and_now.html
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/189532/epic_files_privacy_complaint_against_google_buzz.html
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/189329/google_apologizes_for_buzz_privacy_issues.html?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a38:g26:r1:c0.014090:b30759636:z0

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 8 of 46